Monday, March 28, 2011
New interface for DOAJ
Also, in a posting to the American Science Open Access Forum, Anna-Lena Johansson from DOAJ notes:
"Now there are more than 6300 journals from more than 110 countries in more than 50 languages in the DOAJ. More than 2500 journals are providing metadata on article level, which means that more than 500,000 articles are searchable from DOAJ."
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Monday, March 21, 2011
College and Research Libraries goes open access!
Monday, March 14, 2011
Librarians Against DRM shareable icons
http://readersbillofrights.info/
thanks to Alvin Schrader
Wednesday, March 02, 2011
March 2011 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Saturday, February 05, 2011
Core values of librarianshp
The foundation of modern librarianship rests on an essential set of core values, which define, inform, and guide all professional practice. These values reflect the history and ongoing development of the profession and have been advanced, expanded, and refined by numerous policy statements of the American Library Association. Among these are:
- Access
- Confidentiality/Privacy
- Democracy
- Diversity
- Education and Lifelong Learning
- Intellectual Freedom
- Preservation
- The Public Good
- Professionalism
- Service
- Social Responsibility
Thanks to Al Kagan for the pointer.
Wednesday, February 02, 2011
February 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Sunday, January 02, 2011
Science Online 2011 tweeting and streaming
Polish version of 2010 Dramatic Growth of Open Access
December 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Saturday, January 01, 2011
2010 Dramatic Growth of Open Access
Excerpt:
2010 was the strongest year for open access growth so far. In 2010, 1,401 journals were added to DOAJ for a total of 5,936 journals. The Electronic Journals Library now records over 27,000 journals that can be read free of charge; over 3,500 were added in 2010. 1,037 journals actively participate in PubMedCentral, an increase of 313 over the past year, and more than half of these journals contribute all articles as open access. PMC now provides access to over 3.2 million free articles, an increase of over 300,000 this year. OpenDOAR lists 1,817 repositories, having added 257 this year. A Scientific Commons search encompasses 38 million items, an increase of over 6 million since last year. There are 261 open access mandate policies, an increase of 83 this year.
Happy New Year to the Open Access movement!
Heather Morrison
Thursday, December 23, 2010
ELPUB 2011: Call for submissions
Friday, December 17, 2010
Open Access Week dates: 2011 - 2015
2011: Oct 24 - 30
2012: Oct 22 - 28
2013: Oct 21 - 27
2014: Oct 20 - 26
2015: Oct 19 - 25
Details on the program for 2011 will be announced in the New Year.
Thanks to:
Jennifer McLennan
Program Director, Open Access Week
Thursday, December 02, 2010
December 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Tuesday, November 02, 2010
November 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Thursday, October 28, 2010
http://www.arl.org/news/pr/iscwebinar-04oct10.shtml
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Friday, October 15, 2010
Happy Open Access Week!
Happy Open Access Week from and to all OA Librarians! Still scrambling to finalize plans? Don't forget to check out the OA Week Ning, or check the Open Access Directory page to see what others or doing - or add a link to your own event!
Tuesday, October 05, 2010
SPARC Open Access Week Webcast with Nobel prize winner
Saturday, October 02, 2010
October 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Monday, September 27, 2010
OASPA 2010 Videos Available
Monday, September 06, 2010
Joint Open Letter to International Publishers
Thursday, September 02, 2010
September 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Monday, August 02, 2010
Discovery, rediscovery, and open access
Friday, July 23, 2010
Thursday, July 08, 2010
Renata's Digtial Library Review
Friday, July 02, 2010
July 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Sunday, June 06, 2010
Changing Role of Libraries: Journal Hosting and Support (ARL ACRL Scholarly Communication Institute)
Wednesday, June 02, 2010
June 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Open Access Policies in Europe: David Prosser article
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Canadian action item: help vote up OA to Canadian Research in Canada's Digital Economy Consultation
OA-related items from the Alberta Library Conference
First, at the AGM, the Library Association of Alberta (LAA) voted to investigate setting up an OA policy for the organization. This would follow what other Canadian library associations, such as the British Columbia Library Association (BCLA) and the Canadian Library Association (CLA), have done. In addition, LAA has already taken actions in terms of OA e.g. the LAA newsletter, the Letter of the LAA, is available as a delayed OA publication (http://www.laa.ca/page/letter%20of%20the%20laa%20archives.aspx).
(Disclosure: I moved the motion to investigate setting up an OA Policy.)
Second, the theme for ALC 2011 was announced and it includes an OA component. The theme will be "Open doors, open minds, open access".
Monday, May 10, 2010
Hurray for DOAJ! Over 5,000 journals
Kudos to DOAJ. As I point out over on the Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics, this is more than 20% of the world's scholarly journals that are now fully open access.
This is a conservative estimate - from the OA community, what I hear is a little frustration with the amount of time it takes to get a journal vetted and included in DOAJ. If you'd like to help DOAJ achieve better service - consider joining as a member or sponsor.
Sunday, May 02, 2010
FRPAA introduced in the US House of Representatives (May 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter)
Friday, April 30, 2010
Who will preserve open access news?
Open Access News will remain as it is and where it is, for now, thanks to Google. But what about the long term? Shouldn't someone be preserving this monumental resource, and, my fellow librarians, shouldn't this someone be one of us?
Many thanks to Peter Suber and to sponsors Open Society Institute, SPARC, and the Wellcome Trust.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Friday, April 23, 2010
David Wiley's letter of support for FRPAA
Monday, April 19, 2010
Campus open access publishing funds: SPARC resources and webcast
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Bielefeld Academic Search Engine tutorial on blip TV
Congress takes another stride toward public access to research -- Federal Research Public Access Act introduced in the House of Representatives
www.taxpayeraccess.org
For immediate release
April 15, 2010
For more information, contact
Jennifer McLennan
(202) 296-2296 ext. 121
jennifer [at] arl [dot] org
Congress takes another stride toward public access to research
Federal Research Public Access Act introduced in the House of Representatives
Washington, DC – Fueling the growing momentum toward openness, transparency, and accessibility to publicly funded information, the Federal Research Public Access Act of 2010 (FRPAA) has been introduced today in the U.S. House of Representatives by Rep. Mike Doyle (D-PA) and a bi-partisan host of co-sponsors. The proposed bill would build on the success of the first U.S. mandate for public access to the published results of publicly funded research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and require federal agencies with annual extramural research budgets of $100 million or more to provide the public with online access to research manuscripts stemming from funded research no later than six months after publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
“Free and open access to scientific literature and data are the underpinnings of discovery in the digital age,” said Stephen Friend MD PhD, President and Co-Founder of Sage Bionetworks. “Full collaboration among researchers is essential, and we have the power now to communicate, collaborate, and innovate in ways that were previously unimaginable. I applaud the sponsors of the Federal Research Public Access Act for their commitment to ensuring the kind of access scientists need to make progress on improved disease treatments and diagnostics in the digital world.”
Like the Senate bill introduced in 2009 by Senators Lieberman (I-CT) and Cornyn (R-TX), H.R. 5037 would unlock unclassified research funded by agencies including: Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce, Department of Defense, Department of Education, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the National Science Foundation.
H.R. 5037 follows closely on the heels of a recent expression of interest in public access policies from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, which issued a request for public comment on mechanisms that would leverage federal investments in scientific research and increase access to information that promises to stimulate scientific and technological innovation and competitiveness.
“This bill recognizes the urgent need – and opportunity – to use digital technology to increase the pace of innovation,” added Elliot Schwartz, Vice President for Economic Studies at the Committee for Economic Development. “The bill is a crucial, welcome move toward advancing research through openness and avoiding making the taxpayer pay twice for taxpayer-funded research… it is good public policy.”
The introduction of H.R. 5037 was also welcomed by leaders in the higher education community, who recognize this legislation helps to ensure the United States is positioned to continue to fuel education and innovation.
"Conducting critical research that enriches and improves lives has always been a key mission of universities in this country, including Ohio State," said E. Gordon Gee, president of The Ohio State University. "Disseminating the knowledge gained from that research is an equally important part of our institutions' public purpose. The Federal Research Public Access Act will further spread new knowledge, and it has my full support."
“Advancing research is at the core of the mission of higher education, and broadening access to the scholarly record is a critical step in helping research to advance to its fullest potential,” added Karen Hanson, Provost and Executive Vice President, Indiana University. “The current system for exchanging the results of research is deeply flawed, and major changes – like this bill – are required. I welcome the introduction of the Federal Research Public Access Act.”
The Alliance for Taxpayer Access thanks and congratulates Representative Doyle and all of the bill’s co-sponsors for championing this pivotal legislation, and calls on organizations and individuals to write in support of the bill through the Web site at http://www.taxpayeraccess.org.
For more information about the Federal Research Public Access Act and the broad coalition that supports its passage, visit http://www.taxpayeraccess.org.
###
The Alliance for Taxpayer Access is a coalition of patient, academic, research, and publishing organizations that supports open public access to the results of federally funded research. The Alliance was formed in 2004 to urge that peer-reviewed articles stemming from taxpayer-funded research become fully accessible and available online at no extra cost to the American public. Details on the ATA may be found at http://www.taxpayeraccess.org.
Thursday, April 08, 2010
WorldCat rights and responsibilities for the OCLC cooperative
My comments can be found on The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics. In brief, my suggestion is that the OCLC Record Use Policy Council should scrap this draft, and begin fresh with a vision of how library bibliographic records should be shared for a world with an internet as free and open as it can be. Library catalogue records should be freely accessible and part of a robust and growing public domain. OCLC should refrain from using OCLC or WorldCat branding on records which are, if anything, someone else's creative work. If anyone should sign a catalogue record, it should be the cataloguer - not OCLC.
Please read the draft policy and contribute your own comments.
Wednesday, April 07, 2010
OA journals and TOC RSS feeds
http://tinyurl.com/yahf7ra
Friday, April 02, 2010
April 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Sunday, March 14, 2010
In the interests of intellectual freedom
For the record, while my expertise is not at Harnad's level on this topic, I have read Davis' 2008 study and Alma Swan's synopsis, and I concur with Harnad. I also have posted comments to Phil Davis' blog, on topics on which I have considerable expertise, and they have not appeared.
Harnad's comments, from liblicense:
Phil,
Thanks for the helpful feedback.
I'm afraid you're mistaken about meta-analysis. It can be a
perfectly appropriate statistical technique for analyzing a large
number of studies, with positive and negative outcomes, varying
in methodological rigor, sample size and effect size. It is a way
of estimating whether or not there is a significant underlying
effect.
I think you may be inadvertently mixing up the criteria for (1)
eligibility and comparability for a meta-analysis with the
criteria for (2) a clinical drug trial (for which there rightly
tends to be an insistence on randomized control trials in
biomedical research).
Now I would again like to take the opportunity of receiving this
helpful feedback from you to remind you about some feedback I
have given you repeatedly http://bit.ly/dkieVi on your own 2008
study -- the randomized control trial that you suggest has been
the only methodologically sound test of the OA Advantage so far:
You forgot to do a self-selection control condition. That would
be rather like doing a randomized control trial on a drug - to
show that the nonrandom control trials that have reported a
positive benefit for that drug were really just self-selection
artifacts -- but neglecting to include a replication of the
self-selection artifact in your own sample, as a control.
For, you see, if your own sample was too small and/or too brief
(e.g., you didn't administer the drug for as long an interval, or
to as many patients, as the nonrandom studies reporting the
positive effects had done), then your own null effect with a
randomized trial would be just that: a null effect, not a
demonstration that randomizing eliminates the nonrandomized drug
effect. (This is the kind of methodological weakness, for
example, that multiple studies can be weighted for, in a
meta-analysis of positive, negative and null effects.)
[I am responding to your public feedback here, on the liblicense
and SERIALST lists, but not also on your SSP Blog, where you
likewise publicly posted this same feedback (along with other,
rather shriller remarks) http://j.mp/d91Jk2 because I am assuming
that you will again decline to post my response on your blog, as
you did the previous time that you publicly posted your feedback
on my work both there http://bit.ly/8LK57u and elsewhere -
refusing my response on your blog on the grounds that it had
already been publicly posted elsewhere!...]
- Stevan Harnad
PS The idea of doing a meta-analysis came from me, not from Dr.
Swan.
Friday, March 12, 2010
Thursday, March 04, 2010
New SPARC release: Guide to exloring campus-based OA funds
Disclosure: I manage one of the funds that is discussed in the guide (the Open Access Authors Fund at the Univeristy of Calgary) and my input was solicited for this project.
Tuesday, March 02, 2010
March SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Sunday, February 21, 2010
OpenAIRE Press Release
OpenAIRE (Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe), a three-years project funded under the 7th Framework Programme of the European Commission, has now taken up its work to implement Open Access on a pan-European scale. This ambitious effort unites 38 partners from 27 European countries.
The main goal of OpenAIRE is to support the Open Access pilot, launched by the European Commission in August 2008. This Open Access pilot, which covers about 20% of the FP7 budget, commits researchers from 7 thematic areas (Health, Energy, Environment, Information & Communication Technology, Research Infrastructures, Socio-economic sciences & Humanities and Science in Society) to deposit their research publications in an institutional or disciplinary Open Access repository, to be made available worldwide in full text. OpenAIRE will establish underlying structures for researchers to support them in complying with the pilot through European Helpdesk System, build an OpenAIRE portal and e-Infrastructure for the repository networks and explore scientific data management services together with 5 disciplinary communities.
“The implementation of a Europe wide infrastructure for Open Access is a milestone for the success of Open Access,” says Dr. Norbert Lossau, Scientific Coordinator of OpenAIRE and Director of Göttingen State and University Library, Germany. “The project consortium will work closely together with the European Commission, the ERC and many other stakeholders (such as SPARC Europe, LIBER, EUA) to achieve the broadest possible impact.”
The project consortium incorporates the best available expertise for Open Access & repository infrastructures in Europe and will establish a distributed support structure based on a network of liaison offices covering all European Union member states plus Norway. Consortium partners have been identified in each country, or in the case of Luxembourg, have pledged their support for the development and implementation of strategies and services for Open Access, that have gained acceptance in the international community since 2003, the launch of the Berlin Declaration.
[thanks to Peter Suber at the Open Access Tracking Project]
Saturday, February 13, 2010
New Open Access Fund at SFU Library
At its January 2010 meeting, the Senate Library Committee adopted sweeping recommendations that will make SFU one of only three Canadian universities to embrace Open Access (OA) publishing. “We’re going to put our money where our mouth is,” says Bird. OA Journals are scholarly peer-reviewed journals freely available on the web without subscription fees, but they are often supported through Article Processing Charges (APCs) levied to authors. Fees range from a few hundred to several thousand dollars per accepted paper. Prominent examples are BioMed Central, Public Library of Science, and Hindawi.
(Thanks to Gwen Bird).
Note also that there is a link to the full SFU OA Strategy document at the bottom of this page.
Kudos to Gwen Bird & SFU Library!
Global Knowledge Exchange Network launched
The Global Knowledge Exchange Network (GKEN) is a community for scholars and practitioners to share and explore new ideas and emerging trends related to scholarly research or everyday practice. More specifically, the community is devoted to understanding the changing role of information –its creation, management, dissemination and use– in scholarly research, higher education and business practice.
The project is sponsored jointly by the Harvard Business School Knowledge and Library Services and the Copenhagen Business School Library. The GKEN Founding Team includes Mary Lee Kennedy and Gosia Stergios (Harvard Business School), and René Steffensen and Leif Hansen (Copenhagen Business School).
Thursday, February 04, 2010
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
SPARC webcast: Library-press partnerships
A SPARC Webcast
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
1:00 – 2:00PM EST
Free, but registration required.
Tuesday, February 02, 2010
ARL ACRL Scholarly Communication Institute Webinar Series
[Disclosure: Julie Garrison & I are co-coordinators of this series, and fellow OA Librarian Andrew Waller is among the confirmed speakers].
February 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Monday, January 25, 2010
University of Calgary Students' Union passes resolution to support OA
WHEREAS Open Access is defined as free, unrestricted access to high-quality, peer-reviewed scholarship over the Internet[1],
WHEREAS the SU recognizes that the development of scholarly research is funded by the public through government grants and student tuition,
WHEREAS the SU believes that Open Access improves the educational experience for students,
WHEREAS the SU believes that all students should have access to full scholarly records as they are pursuing their education regardless of an institution’s ability to afford scholarly research subscriptions,
WHEREAS the SU believes open access allows for researchers to maximize the impact of their research through increased visibility in a timely manner,
WHEREAS the SU supports and is encouraged by the initiatives and funding the University of Calgary Library and Cultural Resources have dedicated to Open Access[2],
BE IT RESOLVED THAT the SU calls upon each University of Calgary faculty and researcher to support Open Access initiatives, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the SU continue to advocate for Open Access in all of its advocacy initiatives[3]
Moved: M. Martin
Seconded: D. Pagan
[1] “Student Statement on the Right to Research,” Available: www.righttoresearch.org
Accessed: November 18, 2009.
[2] Initiatives as of October 2009 have included the $100,000 Open Access Authors Fund, being an active partner in the national Synergies project that stores and provides open access to research in Canada, the organization of Open Access Week and expanding the University of Calgary Press to include open access publishing, e-books and print on demand.
[3] Examples would include advocacy at the Canadian Alliance of Student Associations (CASA), Council of Alberta University Students (CAUS), Canadian Roundtable of Academic Materials (CRAM) and SPARC.
This resolution came in part out of the OA Week activities at the University of Calgary, in which the University of Calgary Students' Union (SU) was very active. This policy is now an official lobbying priority for the SU.
The SAA also endorsed SPARC's Student Statement on the Right to Research.
Thanks to Meg Martin for all the information.
Disclosure: I work in Libraries and Cultural Resources at the University of Calgary.
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Public comments on OSTP consultation due Jan. 21
The public comment period on the Obama administration's consultation on OA for federally-funded research expires this Wednesday. The original deadline was January 7, but was extended until January 21.
If you haven't already submitted a comment, use your weekend to write one and send it off no later than Wednesday. You can submit your comment by email or through the OSTP blog.
All signs suggest that the Obama administration is willing to generalize the NIH policy in some form and extend it across the federal government. Show your support for this move! You know that opponents are showing their opposition.
And please spread the word to others who might write comments.
Saturday, January 02, 2010
January 2010 SPARC Open Access Newsletter, or 2009 - Open Access Year Worldwide?
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Monday, December 14, 2009
Version 77, Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography
Sunday, December 13, 2009
E-LIS: Over 10,000 documents
Friday, December 11, 2009
December 11, 2009 Dramatic Growth of Open Access
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
U.S. OA Action Alert
The Obama administration wants OA for federally-funded research
The Obama administration is calling for public comments on ways to enhance access to federally-funded research. From today's announcement:
With this notice, the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) within the Executive Office of the President, requests input from the community regarding enhancing public access to archived publications resulting from research funded by Federal science and technology agencies. This RFI [Request for Information] will be active from December 10, 2009 to January 7, 2010. Respondents are invited to respond online via the Public Access Policy Forum...or may submit responses via electronic mail. Responses will be re-posted on the online forum. Instructions and a timetable for daily blog topics during this period are described at [the White House Open Government Initiative web site]....
[T]he Administration is dedicated to maximizing the return on Federal investments made in R&D. Consistent with this policy, the Administration is exploring ways to leverage Federal investments to increase access to information that promises to stimulate scientific and technological innovation and competitiveness. The results of government-funded research can take many forms, including data sets, technical reports, and peer-reviewed scholarly publications, among others. This RFI focuses on approaches that would enhance the public's access to scholarly publications resulting from research conducted by employees of a Federal agency or from research funded by a Federal agency....
The Executive Branch is considering ways to enhance public access to peer reviewed papers arising from all federal science and technology agencies. One potential model, implemented by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)...requires that all investigators funded by the NIH submit an electronic version of their final, peer-reviewed manuscript upon acceptance for publication no later than 12 months after the official date of publication. Articles collected under the NIH Public Access Policy are archived in PubMed Central and linked to related scientific information contained in other NIH databases....
The NIH model has a variety of features that can be evaluated, and there are other ways to offer the public enhanced access to peer- reviewed scholarly publications. The best models may [be] influenced by agency mission, the culture and rate of scientific development of the discipline, funding to develop archival capabilities, and research funding mechanisms....
Input is welcome on any aspect of expanding public access to peer reviewed publications arising from federal research. Questions that individuals may wish to address include, but are not limited to, the following (please respond to questions individually)....[PS: Here omitting the nine questions; but anyone submitting a comment should read and address them.]
Comments (by Peter Suber)
- This is big. We already have important momentum in Congress for FRPAA. The question here is about separate action from the White House. What OA policies should President Obama direct funding agencies to adopt? This is the first major opening to supplement legislative action with executive action to advance public access to publicly-funded research. It's also the first explicit sign that President Obama supports the OA policy at the NIH and wants something similar at other federal agencies.
- Don't forget that FRPAA has to stand in line behind healthcare reform, financial regulation, and climate change. This is the perfect time to open a new front from the executive branch. Also don't forget that the federal funding agencies belong to the executive branch and are subject to executive order.
- Comments are due January 7. Please write one and spread the word, not necessarily in that order. As far as I can tell, comments from non-citizens addressing the nine questions are as welcome as comments from US citizens.
- You can be sure that the publishing lobby will be writing comments. It's vital that the research community be heard as well, loud and clear.
Tuesday, December 08, 2009
University of Ottawa
The announcement can be found here, with links leading to the components of the OA program.
Congratulations to everyone at the University of Ottawa (especially Tony Horava for sending me the news right away) for putting together a broad program in a very coherent manner.
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
December 2009 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Saturday, November 28, 2009
OA Librarian Kumiko Vezina featured in Concordia Journal
Sunday, November 08, 2009
U.S. House Science committee considering OA -in secret
Why would a country that has seen lots of public discussion on this topic over the past few years suddenly decide on secret discussions? This doesn't exactly sound like democracy, does it?
Monday, November 02, 2009
Peter Suber's Knowledge as a Public Good
This article explains in depth why knowledge makes sense as a public good, and the happy coincidence that this is the month when Elinor Ostrom won the Nobel Prize for physics. Ostrom is well-known for her writing on the commons.
Tuesday, October 06, 2009
Austrian Science Fund: more good news for OA funding
Saturday, October 03, 2009
October 2009 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Dramatic Growth of Open Access: September 30, 2009
Abstract
This issue of The Dramatic Growth of Open Access features a few key quotable numbers to illustrate the growth and current extent of open access: more than 4,000 fully open access, peer reviewed journals in DOAJ, growing by 2 titles per day; close to 1,500 open access repositories listed in OpenDOAR, adding a new repository every business day; over 30 million free publications through Scientific Commons, growing by more than 20 thousands items per day; more than 20% of the world's medical literature is freely available 2 years after publication, and close to 10% is freely available immediately on publication; 1 more journal decides to submit all or most content to PMC every business day, and growth of open access journals in PMC is one new journal every other business day. The number of open access mandate policies is well over a hundred, and growing rapidly - but also likely understated. If you have a policy, please be sure to register with ROARMAP. This quarter saw some minor setbacks. Most notable (but still small) is a decrease in free content through Highwire Press.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Compact for Open Access Publishing Equity: a key step in transitioning to open access
For links to COPE, see Andrew's post.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Compact for Open Access Publishing Equity (COPE)
More details can be found here:
The announcement/press release: http://hul.harvard.edu/news/2009_0914_compact.html
The website for the compact: http://www.oacompact.org/
Thursday, September 10, 2009
PLoS One wins ALPSP award for publishing innovation!
Free webcast of OASPA conference
Dear All, I am pleased to announce that the 1st Conference on Open Access Scholarly Publishing will be broadcast live online at: http://www.river-valley.tv/ in order to broaden the reach of the conference beyond those participants who will be able to physically join us next week. Assuming that there are no technical hiccups, the webcast will begin on Monday September 14th at 12.30 pm Swedish time (11.30 am London/6.30 am in New York), and will continue according to the conference schedule, which can be found at: http://oaspa.org/coasp/sessions.php. If you check the website and find that the webcast is not working, I would encourage you to check back after a while to see if the conference has come back online. The parallel breakout sessions on the second day of the conference, as well as the social events in the evening, will not be broadcast. In addition to the live webcast, we will be recording both the video and audio of all of the conference presentations, which should be made available online within 1-2 weeks after the conference has ended. The recordings of the individual presentations will be posted as soon as they are ready at: http://www.river-valley.tv, and once all of
the presentations have been uploaded we will send out a final announcement. If you will be joining us in Lund, I look forward to seeing you next week. Otherwise, I hope you take the opportunity to check out the conference online.
Best Regards,
Paul Peters,
Chair 1st Conference on Open Access Scholarly Publishing
Caroline Sutton, PhD
Publisher Co-Action Publishing
Tuesday, September 08, 2009
Workshops on creating open access journals
Saturday, September 05, 2009
Please join me for ALCTS Webinar September 23rd
Description
While content recruitment at the local IR may seem slow and painful, from a global / historical perspective, the growth of open access in all its flavors is nothing short of phenomenal. The benefits of the IR for authors and for institutions will become more and more apparent in the near future. The chicken will emerge from the egg, and the IR will be seen as a great career choice. This session will provide an overview of the latest key trends in open access: why we need green as well as gold, both institutional and disciplinary repositories, and open access policies to fill the repositories. Institutional open access policies will be highlighted, introducing different types of policies, what makes for good policy, and approaches to open access policy development at the university.
For details and registration for this and other programs , see the ALCTS Webinar Series.
Kudos to Harvard and for FRPAA support letter and DASH!
Congrats also to Harvard on launch of DASH, Harvard's institutional repository.
What an impressive and inspiring start to the semester!
Wednesday, September 02, 2009
September 2009 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Tuesday, September 01, 2009
Copyright Hall of Janus? : Harvard University’s Two-Faced Approach to Copyrigh
Monday, August 31, 2009
Comments for OA Librarian closed
Wednesday, August 05, 2009
SPARC CALLS ON CAMPUSES TO COORDINATE OPEN-ACCESS POLICY EFFORTS
Sunday, August 02, 2009
August 2009 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Friday, July 03, 2009
ARL SPEC Kit on Authors' Addenda
Hat tip to the Open Access Tracking Project.
July 2009 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
PKP 2009 Conference: Full Program now available
Monday, June 29, 2009
U.S. Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA) re-introduced
Stay tuned to Open Access News for a summary and comments as well as updates like this one.
Sunday, June 21, 2009
E-LIS Team wins OAI6 Poster Prize!
[Disclosure: I am part of the E-LIS team].
Tuesday, June 02, 2009
June 2009 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
Friday, May 22, 2009
PKP Conference 2009 - Early Bird Registration Ends June 8
Planning to attend the Second International PKP Conference in Vancouver from July 8 - 10, 2009? If so, you should register soon, as the Early Bird rates will be ending June 8!
If not, you might want to take a closer look at our outstanding program with over 50 sessions by a truly international caste of speakers from 6 continents, including experienced library and open access publishers, and leaders in academic publishing technologies and initiatives.
Our prestigious international speakers include:
- John Willinsky, PKP Director and Professor at both the Stanford University School of Education and the Department of Language and Literacy Education at the University of British Columbia;
- Ngugi wa Thiong'o, Internationally renowned author and Distinguished Professor of English and Comparative Literature as well as the Director of the International Center for Writing and Translation at the University of California, Irvine;
- Ana Maria Cetto, Investigator, Physics Institute of the National Autonomous University of Mexico and Technical Cooperation Leader and Subdirector of the International Atomic Energy Agency;
- Gregg Gordon, Social Science Research Network President and CEO;
- and many more:
http://pkp.sfu.ca/ocs/pkp/index.php/pkp2009/pkp2009/schedConf/presentations
This year's conference combines a stimulating mixture of both the theoretical and practical, with several pre-conference and post-conference workshops on Open Journal Systems, Lemon8-XML, Creating Open Access Journals, Networkshops for Editors, Librarians, and Software Developers, and Walking the Talking with the CLA Open Access Interest Group:
http://pkp.sfu.ca/ocs/pkp/index.php/pkp2009/pkp2009/schedConf/workshops
Additional conference highlights include:
- An early look at the latest PKP software application, the Open Monograph Press;
- Opportunities for face to face meetings with the PKP Team;
- A software "hackfest" for developers to get together, experiment, and innovate;
- A special focus on graduate students and scholarly publishing;
- And, of course, the beauty of Vancouver in the summer!
http://pkp.sfu.ca/ocs/pkp/index.php/pkp2009/pkp2009/schedConf/travel
We very much hope to see you in July!
Heather G. Morrison
Planning Committee, 2nd International PKP Scholarly Publishing Conference
Project Coordinator
BC Electronic Library Network
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Phone: 778-782-7001
Fax: 778.782.3023
Email: heatherm@eln.bc.ca
Web: http://www.eln.bc.ca
Don't miss! the
2nd International PKP Scholarly Publishing Conference
Vancouver, July 8-10, 2009
http://pkp.sfu.ca/ocs/pkp/index.php/pkp2009/pkp2009
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Library faculties now in the lead in departmental OA mandates!
Monday, May 11, 2009
Why not teach students to use OA resources?
My perspective: information literacy is a key skill for the knowledge age, and the need for librarians to develop and provide instruction will only grow. But why not focus primarily on open access resources, since this is what they will have access to for sure after graduation?
Many librarians, for that matter, are looking for information on how to search for open access information. The top question I've been getting at recent presentations, where I tend to cover just how much OA there is - more than 4,000 journals in DOAJ, over 2.6 million items available in fulltext from PubMed alone, >26 million publications available through Scientific Commons is: so how do I find this stuff? Hint: great topic for a future conference presentation proposal...
Hat tip to Open Access News.
Tuesday, May 05, 2009
ALA, ACRL, and ARL ask judge to assert vigorous oversight of proposed Google Book Search settlement
The associations asserted that although the settlement has the potential to provide public access to millions of books, many of the features of the settlement, including the absence of competition for the new services, could compromise fundamental library values including equity of access to information, patron privacy and intellectual freedom. The court can mitigate these possible negative effects by regulating the conduct of Google and the Book Rights Registry the settlement establishes.
Sunday, May 03, 2009
May 2009 SPARC Open Access Newsletter
We'll be needed, as on July 1 Peter Suber will be moving on to a full-time commitment to open access at Harvard, as a Berkman fellow. Peter will continue to write the SPARC Open Access Newsletter and contribute from time to time to Open Access News. Congratulations and best wishes to Peter, and to Harvard.